I found that the segment illustrates perfectly the mythical character of meritocracy... even leaving aside anything said by Karl Marx.
The ABC journalist, Leigh Sales, reporting on "long-term problem: not enough workers", used the town of Roma, QLD, as example.
There are some problems with imprecise terminology (are we talking about a labour shortage or a skilled workers shortage?); the report involves unions, but no union spokesperson appears in the report. Perhaps a bit more surprising, the report seems to be all about workers and workers even appear in the footage, but none is interviewed. Migration and skilled migration are mentioned, but only an employer's perspective is considered.
I will not dwell on these problems and focus on a more basic problem. All quotations are verbatim and appear in italics, with indentation, so that my comments are clearly distinguished.
From the transcript:
LEIGH SALES, REPORTER: (...) Thanks to the resources boom, the town of Roma, with its 7,000 residents, has unemployment hovering around 2%, but that's not as ideal as it might first sound.
LEIGH SALES: In this story, we'll use Roma as a snapshot to show you how Australia-wide shortages of skilled workers are challenging everyone from the biggest multibillion dollar mining companies to the smallest mum-and-dad businesses.
LEIGH SALES: Welcome to a sort of modern-day gold rush, where workers fly in and out of towns around Australia, like Roma, to take advantage of the resources boom. (...) Workers are in hot demand, and it's small businesses really feeling the pinch.
LEIGH SALES: Spare a thought for Sandy Kelly and her husband Brett, trying to run the local pizza shop.
Ms. Sales is a respected and competent journalist, I want to make that clear from the start.
What follows is the part of the report I would like to focus on:
BRETT KELLY: In the first 18 months we had 96 people come and go.
LEIGH SALES: In just a little local pizza shop?
BRETT KELLY: Yep.
LEIGH SALES: That's more than one a week. Roma's growth means they've never had so many orders for pizza, but they can't hold on to staff.
SANDY KELLY: There are a lot of other jobs out there that have better long-term prospects, probably a higher pay rate, and we're probably seen as the bottom of the chain in the employment ...
LEIGH SALES: In desirability of ...
SANDY KELLY: In desirability.
This part of the report deserves a deeper consideration than what I can offer now.
Here I will limit myself to the following considerations:
The obvious question is whether this couple tried increasing the wages offered, so as to better retain staff. Although the report seems to suggest otherwise, one might assume they did, at least to some limited extent (see Sandy Kelly's second last statement).
Regardless, several things are clear from this passage:
- This couple does not require skilled staff, understanding for that staff with a trade qualification. That is probably the case of many other small businesses (in another part, the report mentions "pubs, shops, small businesses, they're all struggling to find workers").
- Not every businessperson or worker is benefitting equally from this mining boom and associated "labour shortage".
It's evident that this couple is having problems running their business. It's not evident whether the increased volume of sales compensates for these problems.
It's also quite likely that the unskilled workers they require have not benefited greatly from increased wages.
Furthermore, is not clear that one can speak of labour shortage in Australia in general. Currently unemployment has fallen to 4.9%, but underutilization is still 11.9% (as of February 2011). See here.
However, as will be seen shortly, both small businesses and unskilled workers will be required to front up the costs of a situation it's dubious they benefit greatly from.
(...)Here Saul Slake tangentially refers to the reason why small businesses and unskilled workers will be affected by the need to manage the mining boom and "skilled workers shortage". I will repeat and clarify the specific passage: [the mining boom creates] "unsustainable upward pressure on wages [that] could come home to bite us in a very nasty way".
SAUL ESLAKE, GRATTAN INSTITUTE: But given the long-term nature of any effective solution to this kind of problem, it's one that the Government ought to be working on solutions to over the next two or three years because if they don't, then some of those consequences in terms either of opportunities foregone or unsustainable upward pressure on wages could come home to bite us in a very nasty way.
The report demonstrates that, indeed, some skilled workers (essentially those directly or indirectly employed by the mining industry), are seeing their wages increased, as a consequence of the mining boom. The report doesn't provide evidence of this happening to most workers, in most of Australia. In fact, prima facie, I suspect this to be false.
Furthermore, for reasons I will not treat here, it is allegedly only workers' wages that have the inflationary effect Mr. Slake warns us against, not executives' compensation or capitalists' profits.
Regardless of the truth (or falsehood) of this assertion, the fact remains that RBA's monetary policies designed to fight inflation (i.e. inflationary targeting: essentially, higher interest rates) attempt to contain workers' wages and/or employment, not executives' compensation, or capitalists' profits.
In other words: low inflation requires systematically lower wages and higher unemployment from workers alone (not from executives or capitalists), even when only a minority of workers are likely being paid higher wages.
Similarly, low inflation requires higher interest rates, which make small business investment more expensive.
What do these two considerations tell the reader about meritocracy?
In this context, PM Gillard's statements in her "The Dignity of Work" address sound remarkably ironic:
"And we have a policy framework aimed at ensuring all Australians benefit from the opportunities created by the boom."
Update:
The RBA Governor's pay rise:
Workers' increasing wages, due to a "labour shortage", may be highly inflationary; however, as stated above, executives' compensations are not. In fact, high ranking bureaucrats' compensation packages aren't inflationary, either.
If they were, I am sure the RBA would not have risen Mr. Glenn Stevens' yearly package (to AU$ 1 million), as they did. Or would have at least bothered to inform the Federal Treasurer right away, not a year after the fact.
And, let's be fair with Mr. Stevens, private sector compensation packages are a lot higher, without creating any fear of inflation.
Further reading:
Baker, Dean. The Conservative Nanny State. Chapter II: The Workers are Getting Uppity.
Baker's work explains and quantifies, within the American context, the effect of inflationary targeting over wages and employment.
This post was inspired by Baker's work.
No comments:
Post a Comment